ON ROAD TO SUCCESS: A young woman looks for a job at a recruitment fair in central China's Henan Province in March 2007. Job fairs specially for women are frequently held across China to help women develop their careers (XINHUA)

And don't you dare ridicule the idols! Our press only dares to laugh at Muslim saints, not at our own. Manufacturing our heroes (read: 'heroes' who serve our political and economic interests) is a sacred act that can never be ridiculed. Naturally, our media can and are expected to ridicule all iconic figures, symbols, even the songs of Latin American, Chinese or Russian revolutions. In the meantime it wrapped our anti-communist and anti-Left Wing "heroes" in such velvety gowns and attached such divine auras and qualities to their existence that almost nobody who cares about his or her reputation, career or even safety would dare to analyze the true motives behind actions of these saints!

You see, the President of Rwanda—Paul Kagame—is a good man and there can be no discussion about it. He did not attack his own country Rwanda from Uganda on several occasions; he did not kill hundreds of thousands of people in Congo and Rwanda. If you disagree that Kagame is a good chap, you are denying the genocide of 1994. Why? —Well simply because he is our man; because his troops were for years killing on our behalf in DRC/Congo. Now that a UN Report claims Rwanda and Uganda might have committed another genocide in Congo, we keep quiet, hoping the storm will pass and that the main 'donors' to the UN (us—the West—plus our former colony and present ally—Japan) will manage to maneuver the UN to withdraw the document or at least to rephrase the findings—something that has already partly done, given the servile attitude of the Secretary General of the UN—Ban Ki-moon. Do we give Nobel Peace Prize to Rwandan opposition? Not in a blue moon, although their leaders were murdered, imprisoned and some disappeared before the recent presidential elections. Mr. Kagame is our friend and people like Tony Blair—former British Prime Minister—are his personal advisors! Mr. Blair may one day get his Nobel Peace Prize, too, but definitely not the Rwandan opposition.

Do we award Novel Peace Prize to Thai dissidents? Our friendly Thai establishment recently murdered many of them—some were shot from the roofs by snipers; shot in their heads. (I have footage, I was there—do you want to see? Are you interested to see how friendly and peaceful were the opposition Thai Red Shirts?) Of course, the prime minister who ordered the carnage is British-born and British-educated. He is a real gentleman, our gentleman. The U.S. born Thai monarch may be, even according to the U.S. press, the most corrupt king of the 20th century, but he made sure that his country killed so many communists and leftists that we have no choice but to love him and to protect him from any criticism at home or abroad. He also helped us to bomb Viet Nam and Laos, so who cares about human rights. Nobel Peace Prize for the Thai opposition? Get lost! Don't make silly jokes!

Or maybe we should give Nobel Peace Prize to poor indigenous Papuan freedom fighters? Their country was annexed by Indonesia with our help so our mining and logging companies could plunder it indefinitely, while Indonesian elites were and are building their mansions and employ dozens of drivers, gardeners and maids just for fun as they don't know what to do with all that cash in their impoverished country. Even Western human rights organizations admit that more than 100,000 Papuans have been butchered so far. Suggesting one of them should be awarded Nobel Peace Prize? Do you want to get on the permanent blacklist of the Western mass media, or what?

Then maybe we should consider giving Nobel Peace Prize to defenders of democracy in Venezuela—to those people who heroically stood against military coup which was organized by the United States and had one single purpose—to depose Venezuela's democratically elected President Hugo Chavez? Do you see it coming?

Let us seriously, once and for all, drop that ridiculous term—Human Rights! It is stained by invasions, interference in internal affairs, by military coups and subsequent killing, torture and rape.

Or if we are not ready to drop it, let us apply it equally, to every state and to every situation. Let us determine who is the greatest violator of such rights! Let us also determine what the term Human Rights means. What are the most basic human rights? Aren't they those to life and to self-determination? And if they are, aren't we the ones who violated most of them in ancient and recent history?

Mr. Mwandawiro once said many of the NGOs, "civil societies" and human rights organizations are often serving the direct imperialist interests of the West in poor countries. They are the Fifth Columns in Venezuela, in Cuba and in China—in fact, in any country that we are failing to control. Naturally, not all of these organizations are foreign implants, but many of them are and others are frequently bought and manipulated from outside.