e-magazine
Quake Shocks Sichuan
Nation demonstrates progress in dealing with severe disaster
Current Issue
· Table of Contents
· Editor's Desk
· Previous Issues
· Subscribe to Mag
Subscribe Now >>
Expert's View
World
Nation
Business
Finance
Market Watch
Legal-Ease
North American Report
Forum
Government Documents
Expat's Eye
Health
Science/Technology
Lifestyle
Books
Movies
Backgrounders
Special
Photo Gallery
Blogs
Reader's Service
Learning with
'Beijing Review'
E-mail us
RSS Feeds
PDF Edition
Web-magazine
Reader's Letters
Make Beijing Review your homepage
Hot Links

cheap eyeglasses
Market Avenue
eBeijing

Forum
Print Edition> Forum
UPDATED: September 16, 2008 No.38 SEPT.18, 2008
Will Tougher Sentencing Close Corruption Loopholes?
 
Share

The maximum punishment for holding

large amounts of property with unidentified sources, currently five years' imprisonment, is set to double if a draft amendment to the Criminal Law is adopted.

The Standing Committee of the National People's Congress (NPC), China's top legislature, has been deliberating the amendment since August 25, an indication that China is serious about enhancing its anti-corruption efforts.

It has been a crime for 20 years in China to have large amounts of money and possessions that cannot be accounted for. The Supreme People's Court and Supreme People's Procuratorate along with lawmakers at the NPC now say the current punishment for the crime is too lenient and are advocating a 10-year sentence.

It is common for corrupt officials to refuse to divulge the sources of their wealth when they are caught. This is because the more unidentified wealth they have, the fewer bribes they are deemed to have taken. According to China's Criminal Law, officials will receive severe punishment for taking big bribes, yet much lighter penalties for holding unidentified property.

The debate over whether to raise the imprisonment term has been ongoing. Proponents say that a 10-year sentence is already a severe punishment. In the United States, officials accused of holding large amounts of property with unidentified sources face a five-year jail sentence, plus a fine, while in Singapore a similar offence earns no more than 10 years' imprisonment.

Some legal professionals and scholars, however, downplay the role of the unidentified property crime in preventing corruption, saying that most of the unidentified property is incidentally found in the process of investigation into bribery and/or other allegations. They insist that the key does not lie in the severity of punishment for unidentified property, but in the establishment of a property declaration system. If declaring family property becomes an obligation for officials, then they can be punished by law for violation. This is a tight legal network that may effectively prevent corruption, they say.

Big loophole

Li Kejie (Xi'an Evening News): According to the current Criminal Law, the maximum prison term for officials possessing unidentified property worth more than 10 million yuan ($1.5 million) is five years, while the minimum imprisonment for officials involved in bribery is 10 years, even if the bribe is 100,000 yuan ($15,000). Corrupt officials even face the death penalty for bribery. As a result, many "clever officials" deliberately pretend that they do not know where all their wealth came from, as it is quite probably a bribe. As long as the judiciary can't find enough evidence to prove bribery, it can remain unidentified property. The accusation of holding unidentified property therefore serves as an escape route for apprehended corrupt officials, who use this loophole with increasing regularity.

1   2   3   Next  



 
Top Story
-Too Much Money?
-Special Coverage: Economic Shift Underway
-Quake Shocks Sichuan
-Special Coverage: 7.0-Magnitude Earthquake Hits Sichuan
-A New Crop of Farmers
Most Popular
在线翻译
About BEIJINGREVIEW | About beijingreview.com | Rss Feeds | Contact us | Advertising | Subscribe & Service | Make Beijing Review your homepage
Copyright Beijing Review All right reserved