e-magazine
The Hot Zone
China's newly announced air defense identification zone over the East China Sea aims to shore up national security
Current Issue
· Table of Contents
· Editor's Desk
· Previous Issues
· Subscribe to Mag
Subscribe Now >>
Expert's View
World
Nation
Business
Finance
Market Watch
Legal-Ease
North American Report
Forum
Government Documents
Expat's Eye
Health
Science/Technology
Lifestyle
Books
Movies
Backgrounders
Special
Photo Gallery
Blogs
Reader's Service
Learning with
'Beijing Review'
E-mail us
RSS Feeds
PDF Edition
Web-magazine
Reader's Letters
Make Beijing Review your homepage
Hot Links

cheap eyeglasses
Market Avenue
eBeijing

Business
Print Edition> Business
UPDATED: November 11, 2012 NO. 46 NOVEMBER 15, 2012
MARKET WATCH NO. 46, 2012
Share

OPINION

Seeking a New Growth Point

The bottoming out of China's economy is caused by two reasons. For one thing, given that the government has put stabilizing economic growth on the schedule in the fourth quarter of 2011, economic growth, based on previous experience, is expected to stop dwindling by the end of the fourth quarter this year. The other is spontaneous forces of the market such as inventory adjustment. Inventory growth has significantly decelerated. Progressing more rapidly in fully competitive sectors, liquidating inventories to a certain degree will spur the economy to bottom out.

It is more likely that the economic growth rate will rebound in the fourth quarter. GDP growth has been speeding up on a quarter-on-quarter basis. Since structural adjustment featuring capacity reduction has yet to be complete, the economy would level off or rebound slightly if priority is given to restructuring rather than a new round of stimulus. Economic growth is expected to rest at 7.6-7.7 percent this year, and climb to 8 percent next year. But in the middle and long term, the macro-economy has not gone through a substantial change, and capacity reduction won't stop until a new economic growth point is found.

Cyclical factors coupled with structural factors gave rise to the current economic slowdown. As the post-crisis recovery is much more fragile than the world originally expected, countries have unveiled an array of policies, such as the three rounds of quantitative easing policies launched by the United States. To realize a sustainable recovery, it seems inevitable to solve the structural problems accumulated in the previous economic cycles. But fiscal and monetary policies alone are not enough to complete structural adjustment, for both are short-term policies.

To seek a new economic growth point, the pressing needs now are structural tax reduction and dissolving monopolies. Structural tax reduction aims to reduce enterprises' burden to gain recovery and boost their investment in scientific and technical innovation, which means redistributing profits between the government and enterprises. Moreover, anti-monopoly measures are indispensable. The market economy itself tends to generate monopolies, not to mention some countries' tendency to encourage monopolies, which are mostly administrative. Monopoly always smothers innovation. In history, some monopolies even deliberately delayed the application of new techniques in production in order to protect old ones. Under competitive circumstances, technological innovation may lead to destructive innovation and generate new products and technology, evolving into a profit-growth engine. The government should be held responsible to establish rules and create a favorable environment for fair play.

Structural adjustment is viable only when major breakthroughs happen in technical innovation, from which new growth points will arise. Five years have passed since the outbreak of the global financial crisis; however, innovative industries like information technology, which has won extensive recognition across the world, have yet to take shape. By now, countries have selected a number of industries that are believed to have huge potential as a driver of economic growth. Nevertheless, history has told us that just one industry will be enough to help complete the restructuring.

At the current stage, the major task for China is to find out its new industry through competition and technological innovation.

This is an edited excerpt of an interview with Fan Jianping, chief economist of the State Information Center, by Securities Times

THE MARKETS

Overseas Expansion

Bright Food Group, one of China's largest food groups, announced on November 5 that it had completed the acquisition of 60 percent of the British Weetabix Food Co.

With a value of 1.2 billion pounds ($1.92 billion), including company shares and debt, the transaction marks the largest overseas acquisition by a Chinese company in the food and beverage sector.

This transaction allows Bright Food to enter into both the UK and global food markets through the acquisition of a premium global brand.

The Weetabix brand will now have access to all of Bright Food's channels, including over 100,000 retail outlets, allowing it to access Chinese households more rapidly. At the same time, Weetabix is conducting research on the diet and taste preferences of Chinese consumers to support the launch of new products for the Chinese market.

Auto Alliance

Two of China's major automakers, Guangzhou Automobile Group Co. (GAC) and Chery Automobile, announced on November 6 that they will form a strategic partnership and cooperate in a wide range of areas, including research and development, overseas business and production management.

GAC, which has accumulated considerable management experience through its joint venture with foreign partners, has come up short in terms of brand-building and technological innovation, whereas Chery, a successful player in the low-end market, has been weak in terms of profitability.

If successful, analysts said the new partnership might offer a breakthrough for Chinese automakers, although plenty of challenges and obstacles remain for the two due to varied regional interests.

NUMBERS

$730 million

The total transaction value of mergers and acquisitions (M&As) in the Chinese market in October.

$224.83 million

The transaction value of M&As in the energy and mineral resources sector in October.

$83.95 million

The average value of M&As in the biotech and health care sector in October.

(Source: Zero2IPO)

Email us at: yushujun@bjreview.com



 
Top Story
-Protecting Ocean Rights
-Partners in Defense
-Fighting HIV+'s Stigma
-HIV: Privacy VS. Protection
-Setting the Tone
Most Popular
 
About BEIJINGREVIEW | About beijingreview.com | Rss Feeds | Contact us | Advertising | Subscribe & Service | Make Beijing Review your homepage
Copyright Beijing Review All right reserved