e-magazine
The Hot Zone
China's newly announced air defense identification zone over the East China Sea aims to shore up national security
Current Issue
· Table of Contents
· Editor's Desk
· Previous Issues
· Subscribe to Mag
Subscribe Now >>
Expert's View
World
Nation
Business
Finance
Market Watch
Legal-Ease
North American Report
Forum
Government Documents
Expat's Eye
Health
Science/Technology
Lifestyle
Books
Movies
Backgrounders
Special
Photo Gallery
Blogs
Reader's Service
Learning with
'Beijing Review'
E-mail us
RSS Feeds
PDF Edition
Web-magazine
Reader's Letters
Make Beijing Review your homepage
Hot Links

cheap eyeglasses
Market Avenue
eBeijing

1959
Special> China's Tibet: Facts & Figures> Beijing Review Archives> 1959
UPDATED: April 24, 2008 NO.18, 1959
The Peaceful Liberation of Tibet
 
Share

ON May 23, 1951, at a solemn ceremony held in Peking, delegates of the Central People's Government and the former local government of Tibet affixed their signatures to a historic document--the seventeen-article Agreement on-Measures for the Peaceful Liberation of Tibet. This signified Tibet's return to the fold of the motherland. Here is a brief review of the events preceding the signing of this document.

On October 1, 1949, the People's Republic of China was founded. By the end of the year all of China, with the exception of Tibet and Taiwan, had been liberated. To complete the liberation of the mainland, it was decided that the People's Liberation Army should march into Tibet to free the people there from imperialist domination. Preparations began in 1950 and the advance units of the P.L.A. reached Kantse to the east of the Kingsha River. This caused panic among the U.S. and British imperialists and the reactionaries in the local government of Tibet. In January 1950, United Press, the U.S. news agency, spread reports to the effect that the Tibetan authorities would send "goodwill missions" to the United States, Britain, India, Nepal and Peking to declare Tibet's "independence." This was part of the manoeuvres of the U.S. and British imperialists to manufacture pretexts for open intervention in China's internal affairs and to prevent the P.L.A. from entering Tibet.

The spokesman of the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs, in a statement issued on January 20, 1950, sternly condemned this imperialist trick. He declared:

Tibet is a territory of the People's Republic of China. This is a fact which is known to everybody in the world and which has never been denied by anybody. Since this is the case, the Lhasa authorities, of course, have no right arbitrarily to send out any "mission" and, still less, to prove Tibet's "independence." Since the "independence" of Tibet has to be publicized to the Governments of the United States, Britain, India and Nepal, and has to be announced by the American United Press, it is not difficult to see that, if the content of such news is not a United Press fabrication, it is at best merely a puppet show directed by U.S. imperialism and its accomplices who are invading Tibet.

Seeking a peaceful liberation, the Central People's Government made efforts to enter into negotiations with the kasha (the local government of Tibet) at an early date. In July 1950, it sent Living Buddha Geda, Vice Chairman of the former Sikang Provincial People's Government, on a mission to Tibet to open discussions with the kasha. Living Buddha Geda arrived in Chamdo on July             24. There he immediately met with obstructions placed by the British imperialist agent Robert Webster Ford and the local Tibetan reactionaries who prevented him from proceeding further to Lhasa. Ford and his accomplices murdered Living Buddha Geda in August by poisoning and burnt his corpse to hide the crime.

The U.S. and British imperialist intrigues in Tibet were far flung. The Central People's Government deemed it necessary to clear up the situation there and drive out the imperialist forces at an early date. It ordered the People's Liberation Army to enter Tibet. At the instigation of the U.S. and British imperialists, the reactionaries in the local government of Tibet directed the Tibetan army to block the entrance of the P.L.A. at Chamdo. The P.L.A. had to deal punitive and smashing blows to the Tibetan army and, on October 19, 1950, wiped out its main force of over 5,000 men. Chamdo was thus liberated.

Liberation of Chamdo

Following the liberation of Chamdo, the U.S. and British imperialists raised a ballyhoo. At a press conference held in Washington on November 1, 1950, Dean Acheson, then U.S. Secretary of State, openly slandered the entry of the P.L.A. into China's own territory Tibet as "aggression." In an editorial on October 31, 1950, the London Times brazenly asserted: "The claim [that Tibet is a part of Chinese territory--Ed.] cannot be justified in history." It tried to incite the Governments of India and Pakistan to lodge "protests" with China.

Among the Tibetan ruling clique, there was a handful of reactionaries headed by Regent Tagcha who were working hand in glove with imperialism and foreign expansionists. They abducted the Fourteenth (the present) Dalai Lama to Yatung from where they planned to take him abroad. They were counting on a third world war for staging a come-back. However, their scheme to abduct the Dalai Lama to India aroused opposition among both the masses of Tibetan people and the three major Tibetan monasteries. Not a few kanpos and kaloons close to the Dalai Lama also disapproved of the scheme and favoured negotiations with the Central People's Government. The struggle ended in victory for the patriotic and progressive forces which opposed the flight of the Dalai Lama and represented the wishes of the Tibetan people.

Consequently, in the spring of 1951, Tagcha stepped down and the Fourteenth Dalai Lama assumed power. The Dalai Lama then appointed kaloon Ngapo Ngawang Jigme and four others as plenipotentiaries of the local government of Tibet to conduct negotiations in Peking. The U.S. and British imperialist plot to prevent direct negotiations between Tibet and the motherland was completely foiled.

Agreement Signed in Peking

Upon its arrival in Peking the Tibetan delegation started negotiations with the delegates appointed by the Central People's Government for a peaceful liberation of Tibet. In the short period of one month, agreement was reached on all important questions. On May 23, 1951, the Agreement on Measures for the Peaceful Liberation of Tibet was signed.

This document provided correct solutions to the question of the relations between Tibet and the motherland, and also to problems of relations between the Dalai Lama and Panchen Erden which had been outstanding for 30 years. This agreement was a brilliant achievement of the Chinese Communist Party in settling a very intricate domestic question of nationalities.

The Fourteenth Dalai Lama returned from Yatung to Lhasa on August 17, 1951. On October 26, units of the People's Liberation Army arrived in Lhasa and were warmly welcomed by the Tibetan people, both lamas and laymen. In a telegram to Chairman Mao Tse-tung on October 24, 1951, the Dalai Lama said that "the delegates of both parties, on a friendly basis, signed the Agreement on Measures for the Peaceful Liberation of Tibet on May 23, 1951." The lamas and laymen of Tibetan nationality, he said, support the agreement unanimously. "Under the leadership of Chairman Mao Tse-tung and the Central People's Government, they are actively helping the People's Liberation Army units marching into Tibet to strengthen national defence, drive imperialist forces from Tibet and safeguard the unification of the territory and sovereignty of the motherland," he stated.

The Tibetan people were thus freed from imperialist fetters and returned to the big family of fraternal nationalities of the People's Republic of China.

(This article appears on page 17, No. 18, 1959)



 
Top Story
-Protecting Ocean Rights
-Partners in Defense
-Fighting HIV+'s Stigma
-HIV: Privacy VS. Protection
-Setting the Tone
Most Popular
 
About BEIJINGREVIEW | About beijingreview.com | Rss Feeds | Contact us | Advertising | Subscribe & Service | Make Beijing Review your homepage
Copyright Beijing Review All right reserved