e-magazine
Charting the Course
China reviews the year gone by and sets new goals accordingly
Current Issue
· Table of Contents
· Editor's Desk
· Previous Issues
· Subscribe to Mag
Subscribe Now >>
Expert's View
World
Nation
Business
Finance
Market Watch
Legal-Ease
North American Report
Forum
Government Documents
Expat's Eye
Health
Sci-Tech
Lifestyle
Books
Movies
Backgrounders
Special
Photo Gallery
Blogs
Reader's Service
Learning with
'Beijing Review'
E-mail us
RSS Feeds
PDF Edition
Web-magazine
Reader's Letters
Make Beijing Review your homepage
Hot Links

Market Avenue
eBeijing

For Your Information
Cover Stories Series 2015> Against Fake Goods> For Your Information
UPDATED: February 9, 2015 NO. 7 FEBRUARY 12, 2015
Alibaba-SAIC Dispute Blow by Blow
Share

January 23

The SAIC's sample test showed that only 37.25 percent of surveyed commodities sold on Taobao.com were authentic, lower than a 58.7-percent average of major online shopping platforms and much lower than 90 percent for JD.com, and 85.71 percent for Tmall, a business-to-customer online marketplace of Alibaba.

January 27

Taobao accused the SAIC of unfair treatment over its random quality inspection by issuing a letter on its official Sina Weibo. Taobao questioned the poll's sampling method and its test standards, claiming that the regulator released the survey results to the public without giving Alibaba a chance to first appeal.

Later that day, the SAIC issued an immediate response, stressing that all of the activities they conducted were in line with the law.

January 28

The SAIC released a document called the White Paper on Administrative Guidelines for Alibaba to the public, accusing Alibaba of allowing illegal operations to flourish on its online shopping websites and urged the company's executives to overcome their arrogance.

Later that day, Taobao posted a response on its official microblog, saying the company will file a complaint against Liu Hongliang, Director of the SAIC's Department of Market Regulation, claiming that he drew inappropriate and non-objective conclusions after the investigation.

January 29

Three vendors on Alibaba's Tmall.com platform voiced strong protests against the SAIC report, saying their stores had been frozen by Tmall since the SAIC report and they had not received any report or evidence from the SAIC showing what they had done wrong. In an online statement, they pledged to use administrative litigation to protect their legitimate interests if the SAIC refuses to respond.

The stock price of Alibaba plunged 8.78 percent.

January 30

The two sides finally made peace when the head of China's commerce regulator met with Alibaba's Chairman Jack Ma to exchange opinions on joint efforts to fight the sale of fake products.

The SAIC said the white paper it released earlier is only a meeting minutes report and does not have legal validity.

The stock price of Alibaba decreased 4.36 percent.

(Compiled by Beijing Review)



 
Top Story
-Empowerment Through Infrastructure
-Special Reports: APEC China 2014
-Protection at Home
-A Weaker Union
-Will the 'China Miracle' Continue?
Most Popular
在线翻译
About BEIJINGREVIEW | About beijingreview.com | Rss Feeds | Contact us | Advertising | Subscribe & Service | Make Beijing Review your homepage
Copyright Beijing Review All right reserved