e-magazine
The Hot Zone
China's newly announced air defense identification zone over the East China Sea aims to shore up national security
Current Issue
· Table of Contents
· Editor's Desk
· Previous Issues
· Subscribe to Mag
Subscribe Now >>
Expert's View
World
Nation
Business
Finance
Market Watch
Legal-Ease
North American Report
Forum
Government Documents
Expat's Eye
Health
Science/Technology
Lifestyle
Books
Movies
Backgrounders
Special
Photo Gallery
Blogs
Reader's Service
Learning with
'Beijing Review'
E-mail us
RSS Feeds
PDF Edition
Web-magazine
Reader's Letters
Make Beijing Review your homepage
Hot Links

cheap eyeglasses
Market Avenue
eBeijing

Business
Cover Story Series> Business
UPDATED: April 3, 2010 NO. 14 APRIL 8, 2010
The Crux of the Currency Dispute
China may not be the currency manipulator the United States makes it out to be.

Even though China has become a major trading power and has changed the world economic pattern to a certain extent, it is still incapable of taking currency manipulation, considering the country's limited economic strength—its GDP is only one third of the United States'—and overall ability for such an action
By YU ZUYAO
Share

How unfair the trade?

INCREASED SHIPPING: A cargo vessel full of goods stops at Yantian Port of Shenzhen in Guangdong Province. Ships entering and leaving the port have increased as the world economy recovers (CHEN YEHUA)

The United States claims that China has been in a favorable position in their bilateral trade. In 2009, U.S. statistics showed China's trade surplus with it was $226.8 billion. (China Custom figure was $140 billion.) But not all the surplus has flowed into Chinese pockets.

Processing trade goods are China's major exported products. Among all those goods exported to America in 2009, about 73 percent were produced by foreign-owned and joint-venture companies in China. Also, among high value-added and hi-tech products exported by China, foreign companies took up more than 90 percent. The Chinese surplus generated by those companies should not be included.

More than 20 percent of "Made-in-China" products exported to the United States are from American companies invested in China. But the U.S. Government puts the trade surplus generated by those companies on China.

The U.S. calculation also includes those products labeled "Made-in-China" that are actually re-exported by other countries or regions.

Therefore, China is not responsible for causing the huge trade deficit with the United States. The long-term China-U.S. trade imbalance is actually a consequence of the discriminating trade policy adopted by the United States against China.

After adopting the reform and opening-up policy in 1978, China has always welcome U.S. products and investments. Against the backdrop of the global financial crisis, China organized a number of purchasing delegations to America in a bid to boost U.S. exports to China.

In a striking contrast, the U.S. Government strictly forbids exports of hi-tech products to China, and only allows exports of industrial goods and agricultural products. This is the true reason for the U.S. trade deficit with China.

The crux of China-U.S. trade relations is not "imbalance," but "unfairness." Among the annual average $400-billion trade volume between the two countries, China provides cheap, quality daily necessities for U.S. citizens at the cost of heavily polluting its environment and diminishing its natural resource reserves. And look what they have given in return—greenbacks whose actual value is much less than the market value, since the U.S. Government can always print more dollars to pay off its debts when necessary. After China exchanges goods for U.S. dollars, it lends the dollars back to help the United States cover up its huge fiscal deficit, which is expected to be $1.5 trillion in 2010. This allows the United States to avert bankruptcy, guarantee its public welfare expenditures, and save itself from undergoing a second round of financial turmoil.

To bring balance to China-U.S. trade, the U.S. Government must drop its current discriminatory trade policies against China, and get back on the right track of equal, fair, and mutually beneficial trade.

The author is a senior economist at the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences

   Previous   1   2  



 
Top Story
-Protecting Ocean Rights
-Partners in Defense
-Fighting HIV+'s Stigma
-HIV: Privacy VS. Protection
-Setting the Tone
Most Popular
 
About BEIJINGREVIEW | About beijingreview.com | Rss Feeds | Contact us | Advertising | Subscribe & Service | Make Beijing Review your homepage
Copyright Beijing Review All right reserved