e-magazine
The Hot Zone
China's newly announced air defense identification zone over the East China Sea aims to shore up national security
Current Issue
· Table of Contents
· Editor's Desk
· Previous Issues
· Subscribe to Mag
Subscribe Now >>
Expert's View
World
Nation
Business
Finance
Market Watch
Legal-Ease
North American Report
Forum
Government Documents
Expat's Eye
Health
Science/Technology
Lifestyle
Books
Movies
Backgrounders
Special
Photo Gallery
Blogs
Reader's Service
Learning with
'Beijing Review'
E-mail us
RSS Feeds
PDF Edition
Web-magazine
Reader's Letters
Make Beijing Review your homepage
Hot Links

cheap eyeglasses
Market Avenue
eBeijing

Business
Print Edition> Business
UPDATED: September 3, 2012 NO. 36 SEPTEMBER 6, 2012
Frictions Over Renewable Energy
China and the United States struggle to cooperate in the pursuit of new energy
By Lan Xinzhen
Share

HITECH: A worker at Yingli Solar in Hainan Province processes silicon chips on August 22 (GUO CHENG)

Disputes between China and the United States over the renewable energy industry are intensifying.

After the U.S. Department of Commerce launched anti-dumping and countervailing measures against Chinese photovoltaic (PV) energy products in May and wind power products in July, the Chinese Ministry of Commerce (MOFCOM) launched a probe into several U.S. renewable energy projects on August 20. The ruling was that six renewable energy projects from the United States have violated World Trade Organization anti-subsidy rules, distorting international trade.

The MOFCOM announcement said that according to the provisions of Foreign Trade Barriers Investigation Rules, the ministry will take relevant measures in accordance with the law, requiring the United States to cancel the investigations that are inconsistent with WTO agreements and give fair treatment to renewable energy products imported from China.

For China, this may be a powerless response. But insiders are worried that disputes between China and the United States over the renewable energy industry may harm the two sides' healthy cooperation in the sector and have a negative impact on the world's new energy development.

A trade war?

On October 19, 2011, six U.S. solar panel manufacturers filed a complaint with the U.S. Department of Commerce and the U.S. International Trade Commission, accusing Chinese solar companies of receiving subsidies from the Chinese Government and selling panels in the U.S. market at prices below their costs. On November 10, 2011, the U.S. Department of Commerce launched anti-dumping and countervailing investigations on Chinese PV companies, marking the beginning of frictions between China and the United States over renewable energy products. Currently, China is the world's largest manufacturer of PV products, with 10 percent of its solar cells exported to the United States and 80 percent to Europe.

In January this year, the United States expanded the trade dispute from solar power to wind power products. The U.S. Department of Commerce and the U.S. International Trade Commission announced on January 19 anti-dumping and countervailing investigations on utility-scale wind tower products imported from China and Viet Nam.

The price of the wind tower accounts for about 20 percent of that of the finished wind turbine. Because the wind tower is mainly made of steel, many steel-producing companies started manufacturing wind towers, which has resulted in excess production capacity for Chinese wind tower manufacturers and low prices of the product. Since last year, wind towers manufactured by China and Viet Nam have occupied one fourth of the U.S. market.

On May 17, the U.S. Department of Commerce imposed preliminary anti-dumping duties ranging from 31.14 percent to 249.96 percent on Chinese solar cell manufacturing companies and backdated the imposition to 90 days prior.

Suntech Power and Trina Solar face tariffs of 31.22 percent and 31.14 percent respectively. Yingli Solar and other companies that responded to the complaint were hit with a duty of 31.18 percent, and other companies that did not respond to the complaint were charged with a duty of 249.96 percent. If the decision remains unchanged, this will be the first time that Chinese companies are charged with such high tariffs as punishment.

1   2   3   4   Next  



 
Top Story
-Protecting Ocean Rights
-Partners in Defense
-Fighting HIV+'s Stigma
-HIV: Privacy VS. Protection
-Setting the Tone
Related Stories
-A Winner and a Loser
-Rare Earth Export Regulation
 
Most Popular
 
About BEIJINGREVIEW | About beijingreview.com | Rss Feeds | Contact us | Advertising | Subscribe & Service | Make Beijing Review your homepage
Copyright Beijing Review All right reserved