e-magazine
Quake Shocks Sichuan
Nation demonstrates progress in dealing with severe disaster
Current Issue
· Table of Contents
· Editor's Desk
· Previous Issues
· Subscribe to Mag
Subscribe Now >>
Expert's View
World
Nation
Business
Finance
Market Watch
Legal-Ease
North American Report
Forum
Government Documents
Expat's Eye
Health
Science/Technology
Lifestyle
Books
Movies
Backgrounders
Special
Photo Gallery
Blogs
Reader's Service
Learning with
'Beijing Review'
E-mail us
RSS Feeds
PDF Edition
Web-magazine
Reader's Letters
Make Beijing Review your homepage
Hot Links

cheap eyeglasses
Market Avenue
eBeijing

Top Story
Top Story
UPDATED: February 4, 2013 NO. 6 FEBRUARY 7, 2013
What's the Real Income Gap
Gini coefficient figures arouse calls for reforming the income distribution system
By Lan Xinzhen
Share

The NBS figures show the national Gini coefficient reached between 0.47 and 0.49 in the past 10 years. "This requires the government to acknowledge and solve the problem of income inequality," said Yu. Both governmental and independent information prove that China has indisputably exceeded the internationally accepted warning line.

Ma agrees. "The Gini coefficient reflects China's large income gap, indicating the urgency to accelerate reform," he said at the press conference on January 18.

The scheme of income distribution reform was initially drafted in 2004. Since the issue involves livelihoods as well as economic and social development, the draft remains incomplete.

The Gini coefficient is just as important as the GDP. If the latter reflects the size of the cake, the former reveals ways in which it is distributed. China's GDP has now exceeded 50 trillion yuan ($7.96 trillion). If the country cannot properly distribute wealth, the Gini coefficient will continue to rise, threatening the sustainability of China's economic development and making the country fall into the "middle income trap."

According to Ma, the government should be rational in analyzing China's income inequality and formulate a proper scheme for reform, focusing on the relationship between the market and the efficiency of development as well as wealth distribution.

Su Hainan, Deputy Director of the China Association for Labor Studies, thinks the NBS data will serve as an assessment standard to deepen the reform of income distribution and highlight the government's resolution to address inequality.

Reform must entail not only the raising of wages, but also make up for the shortfall in housing, education, healthcare and pension funds, alongside readjusting unreasonable property distribution.

Su also believes in "upping low incomes" while "controlling high earnings." The former refers to realizing full social security coverage, properly raising the minimum wage, upping salaries in labor-intensive industries and further increasing farmer incomes. Moreover, the government will offer more low-rent and affordable homes to low-income groups while helping depositors and individual stock investors enjoy reasonable interests and yields.

To "control high earnings," the government will keep tabs on the excessively high salaries associated with senior company management and monopolistic industries. On the other hand, the state will gradually change the unreasonable distribution of property proceeds. Based on such measures, China will also improve the collection of individual income tax, accelerate property tax reform and launch the estate tax at the proper time, strengthen management of the stock and real estate market as well as better manage the resource allocation system to ensure fairness.

"Only by making efforts along the above lines can the country gradually lower its Gini coefficient and realize common prosperity," Su said.

The target for reform remains unchanged—enlarge the middle class.

"As the most difficult task in China's development, progress in income distribution reform is expected," he added.

Email us at: lanxinzhen@bjreview.com

Gini Coefficient

The Gini coefficient measures income inequality. It is a number between 0 and 1, where 0 corresponds to perfect income equality, and 1 to perfect inequality. The internationally recognized warning line of income inequality is 0.4. The higher the Gini coefficient, the greater the inequality.

   Previous   1   2   3  



 
Top Story
-Too Much Money?
-Special Coverage: Economic Shift Underway
-Quake Shocks Sichuan
-Special Coverage: 7.0-Magnitude Earthquake Hits Sichuan
-A New Crop of Farmers
Related Stories
-Ambitious and Practical
-A New Starting Point
 
Most Popular
在线翻译
About BEIJINGREVIEW | About beijingreview.com | Rss Feeds | Contact us | Advertising | Subscribe & Service | Make Beijing Review your homepage
Copyright Beijing Review All right reserved